<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Age and Ageing - current issue</title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Age and Ageing - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1468-2834</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>September 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Age and Ageing</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0002-0729</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/490?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/491?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/493?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/495?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/513?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/526?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/536?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/578?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/585?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/602?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/606?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/609?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/610?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's view]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Francis, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's view]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>489</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editor's view</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/490?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What determines the ability to stop smoking in old age?]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/490?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What determines the ability to stop smoking in old age?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>491</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>490</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/491?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Economic evaluations of complex services for older people]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/491?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harwood, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Economic evaluations of complex services for older people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>493</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>491</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/493?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alcohol for the older person--friend or foe?]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/493?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chiu, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alcohol for the older person--friend or foe?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>494</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>493</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/495?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[News and Reviews]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/495?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diogenes,  ]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[News and Reviews]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>496</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>495</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>News and Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is it time to separate subjective cognitive complaints from the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment?]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) are currently considered to be a core feature of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Yet the implications of including or excluding subjective complaints has not been previously considered. The key questions are how many health people complain of SCC compared to those with MCI? How is the epidemiology of MCI affected by the requirement for SCC? How is the prognosis of MCI influenced by SCC? and how should SCC be defined and measured? Findings to date suggest that subjective complaints are one of many variables that comprise risk in individuals with MCI. Individuals who do not have subjective complaints and might not qualify under current definitions of MCI may still have a disorder that is of clinical significance. Despite a close association, SCC may be neither necessary nor sufficient for a diagnosis of either MCI or dementia.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is it time to separate subjective cognitive complaints from the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>499</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Male genital dermatoses in old age]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This review aims to highlight the clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of the most common dermatoses of the male genitals in old age. Diseases of the male genitalia range from infectious problems to inflammatory and neoplastic dermatoses. These can affect sexual and urinary functions. The importance of the former in older men should not be underestimated. Pre-malignant and malignant penile lesions are discussed. Although rare, penis cancer is preventable and curable if diagnosed early.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Singh, S., Bunker, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Male genital dermatoses in old age]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>504</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alcohol, dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> dementia and cognitive decline have been linked to cardiovascular risk. Alcohol has known negative effects in large quantities but may be protective for the cardiovascular system in smaller amounts. Effect of alcohol intake may be greater in the elderly and may impact on cognition.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> to evaluate the evidence for any relationship between incident cognitive decline or dementia in the elderly and alcohol consumption, a systematic review and meta-analyses were carried out. Criteria for inclusion were longitudinal studies of subjects aged &ge;65, with primary outcomes of incident dementia/cognitive decline.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> 23 studies were identified (20 epidemiological cohort, three retrospective matched case-control nested in a cohort). Meta-analyses suggest that small amounts of alcohol may be protective against dementia (random effects model, risk ratio [RR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.53&ndash;0.75) and Alzheimer's disease (RR 0.57; 0.44&ndash;0.74) but not for vascular dementia (RR 0.82; 0.50&ndash;1.35) or cognitive decline (RR 0.89; 0.67&ndash;1.17) However, studies varied, with differing lengths of follow up, measurement of alcohol intake, inclusion of true abstainers and assessment of potential confounders.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> because of the heterogeneity in the data these findings should be interpreted with caution. However, there is some evidence to suggest that limited alcohol intake in earlier adult life may be protective against incident dementia later.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peters, R., Peters, J., Warner, J., Beckett, N., Bulpitt, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alcohol, dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>512</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Systematic Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/513?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Post-acute care for older people in community hospitals--a cost-effectiveness analysis within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/513?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives:</b> to compare the cost effectiveness of post-acute care for older people provided in community hospitals with general hospital care.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> cost-effectiveness study embedded within a randomised controlled trial.</p>
<p><b>Setting:</b> seven community hospitals and five general hospitals at five centres in the midlands and north of England.</p>
<p><b>Participants:</b> 490 patients needing rehabilitation following hospital admission with an acute illness.</p>
<p><b>Intervention:</b> multidisciplinary team care for older people in community hospitals.</p>
<p><b>Measurements:</b> EuroQol EQ-5D scores transformed into quality-adjusted life years; health and social service costs during the 6-month period following randomisation.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> there was a non-significant difference between the community hospital and general hospital groups for changes in quality-adjusted life-year values from baseline to 6 months (mean difference 0.048; 95% confidence interval &ndash;0.028 to 0.123; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.214). Resource use was similar for both groups. The mean (standard deviation) costs per patient for health and social services resources used were comparable for both groups: community hospital group &pound;8,946 (&pound;6,514); general hospital group &pound;8,226 (&pound;7,453). These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimate was &pound;16,324 per quality-adjusted life year. A cost effectiveness acceptability curve suggests that if decision makers' willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year was &pound;10,000, then community hospital care was effective in 47% of cases, and this increased to only 50% if the threshold willingness to pay was raised to &pound;30,000.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> the cost effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation for older people was similar in community hospitals and general hospitals.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'reilly, J., Lowson, K., Green, J., Young, J. B., Forster, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Post-acute care for older people in community hospitals--a cost-effectiveness analysis within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>520</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>513</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of executive cognitive functioning on rates of smoking cessation in the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cigarette smoking is one of the leading preventable causes of death. Previous research has shown that many common smoking cessation interventions are effective with older smokers; a few interventions have been tailored to this population. To our knowledge, however, no smoking cessation research or interventions targeted at older adults have addressed the influence of cognition on successful smoking cessation. We hypothesized that impairment of executive cognitive functioning (ECF), which is relatively prevalent among older adults, would negatively influence smoking cessation rates among older smokers. The relationship of ECF to smoking cessation was examined in a population-based sample of 1,338 community-dwelling older persons in Colorado's San Luis Valley, 204 of whom were current smokers. As predicted, current ECF did not predict early smoking behaviour, but was a significant predictor of successful smoking cessation. Older persons suffering from executive dysfunction were less likely to have quit smoking than were their cognitively intact counterparts (OR&nbsp;=&nbsp;1.10, 95% CI 1.04&ndash;1.17, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.01). Among those with normal ECF, 73.7% had quit smoking, compared with 65.1% of participants showing any level of ECF impairment. Limiting the sample to individuals who were active smokers at or after the age of 65, when executive impairment is relatively common, produced similar results. Individuals with better executive functioning were more likely to have quit smoking (OR&nbsp;=&nbsp;1.12, 95% CI 1.02&ndash;1.23, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.02).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brega, A. G., Grigsby, J., Kooken, R., Hamman, R. F., Baxter, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of executive cognitive functioning on rates of smoking cessation in the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>525</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/526?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Severe nocturnal hypoxaemia in geriatric inpatients]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/526?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> oxygen levels are decreased in older people especially in the supine position, and during sleep. Geriatric inpatients often suffer from stroke and heart disease. Respiratory control may be substantially affected.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> the aim of this study was to examine oxygen levels during night in inpatients on geriatric medical wards to find out if they needed nocturnal oxygen therapy.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> prospective observational study.</p>
<p><b>Setting/Participants:</b> we consecutively examined 133 patients with SpO<SUB>2</SUB> &ge;92% in sitting position by an overnight -8-h pulse oximetry. Patients with severe obesity, dementia or pulmonary disease were excluded. The test was performed at least 4 days after the event in stroke cases.</p>
<p><b>Outcome Variables:</b> ninety two patients, m/f 43/49, with mean age 78.3 &plusmn; 6.9 SD completed the test. Sixty six patients suffered from stroke; 34 left-sided and 19 right-sided stroke. Nine patients suffered from a heart disease only, and 17 patients suffered from other diseases.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> according to the guidelines for long-term oxygen therapy recommendations for nocturnal oxygen therapy, we found that 26% of the patients fulfilled the criteria of SpO<SUB>2</SUB> &le;90% for &ge;30% of the time. There was a significant positive correlation between age and the amount of time with SpO<SUB>2</SUB> between 80 and 84% (0.215, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.05). Diagnosis or severeness of disease did not significantly affect nocturnal SpO<SUB>2</SUB> %. The 1-year survival rate was 75% in group I (hypoxaemic) versus 84% in group II (normoxaemic) (NS).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> nearly 30% of the inpatients in geriatric medical wards suffered from severe oxygen-requiring nocturnal hypoxaemia irrespective of diagnosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hjalmarsen, A., Hykkerud, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Severe nocturnal hypoxaemia in geriatric inpatients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>529</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>526</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Age does not hamper the response to pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves health status and exercise tolerance, but not respiratory function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Our objective was to identify predictors of improvement in the 6-min walked distance (6'WD) in elderly COPD patients after PR.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> this was a prospective observational study performed in an ambulatory rehabilitation setting. We enrolled 74 patients aged 65&ndash;83 years (mean: 74.2, SD: 4.4) with stable COPD in GOLD stage 3&ndash;4. About half (45.6%) of them had a basal O<SUB>2</SUB> saturation of 90% or less. After a baseline multi-dimensional assessment, patients underwent a 20-session rehabilitation cycle including training of the upper and lower extremities, and respiratory exercises, along with education sessions. The difference between final and basal 6'WD was expressed as a per cent of the basal value (6'WD gain). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the 6'WD gain was above or under the 75th percentile, corresponding to 33% gain.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> patients whose 6'WD improved more had lower baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) (46.0 versus 52.2%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.03) and baseline 6'WD, both as an absolute value (329.5 versus 408.9 m, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.01) and as a per cent of the predicted (71.1 versus 93.5%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.002). After correction for potential confounders, baseline 6'WD was the only variable associated with the outcome (OR for 5% increments: 0.79; 95% CI 0.65-0.95).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> among elderly patients with COPD, a comprehensive rehabilitation programme can significantly improve the 6'WD even in the presence of chronic hypoxemia. The most physically impaired patients achieve the greatest benefit from rehabilitation, but we could not develop a model accurately predicting the response to rehabilitation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Di Meo, F., Pedone, C., Lubich, S., Pizzoli, C., Traballesi, M., Incalzi, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Age does not hamper the response to pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>535</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/536?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fracture risk assessment in frail older people using clinical risk factors]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/536?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> this study aims to develop and evaluate a simple fracture risk index for use in frail older people.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> clinical risk factors were assessed at baseline for 2,005 older people (473 males, 1,532 females; mean age 85.7 years, SD 7.1 years) living in aged-care facilities. Fractures were ascertained for 2 years from baseline. Cox regression model was used to identify significant risk factors for fracture. Hazard ratios (HRs) from the model were assigned as weights. The risk index was calculated by multiplying the weights of all risk factors.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> during a mean follow-up of 1.64 years, 401 fractures occurred in 338 participants. Significant independent clinical risk factors for fracture were institution type, balance, history of previous fracture, cognitive function, number of medications, weight and lower leg length (<I>n</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;1,813). The index was capable of identifying higher-risk individuals, with almost an 8-fold increase in the risk of fracture for residents from the lowest 15% to the highest 18% of the score. Among 1-year survivors, a high score (&ge;15) indicated approximately a one-in-six chance of fracture, while a low score (&lt;8) indicated only a one-in-forty chance of fracture within a year. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65&ndash;0.72) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.65&ndash;0.71) for identifying someone who would have a fracture in 1 and 2 years respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> this risk index could identify individuals at higher fracture risk among institutionalised older people, and thus, could help to rationalise the provision of fracture prevention programs in this population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, J. S., Simpson, J. M., March, L. M., Cameron, I. D., Cumming, R. G., Lord, S. R., Seibel, M. J., Sambrook, P. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fracture risk assessment in frail older people using clinical risk factors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>541</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>536</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Urinary incontinence in stroke: results from the UK National Sentinel Audits of Stroke 1998-2004]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> urinary incontinence (UI) after stroke is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The UK National Sentinel Audits of Stroke have collected data on UI which has not previously been reported.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> data on standards relating to both organisations and process of care were extracted from the audits to look for trends in service provision, continence care planning and discharge destination of incontinent versus continent stroke survivors. In addition, 2004 data was analysed statistically to look for a link between stroke units meeting certain standards and the likelihood of patients having continence plans.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> UI rates have changed little over the four audit cycles. The influence of UI on discharge destination has also altered little. Stroke unit care is more strongly associated with management planning for UI in stroke.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, D., Lowe, D., Hoffman, A., Rudd, A., Wagg, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Urinary incontinence in stroke: results from the UK National Sentinel Audits of Stroke 1998-2004]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>546</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the prescribing of medications by old age psychiatrists for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> despite evidence of limited efficacy, psychotropic medications are widely used as a first line treatment for those with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Clearly various factors must be influencing their continued use; these are explored here.</p>
<p><b>Aims:</b> to examine the process by which consultant old age psychiatrists prescribe for BPSD and explore the factors that influence their decisions.</p>
<p><b>Method:</b> a focus group generated initial questions for interviews with eight consultant old age psychiatrists, using a grounded theory methodology.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> differences in how assessment information was utilised resulted in inconsistencies in choice of medication between psychiatrists. Psychiatrists felt pressured to prescribe, largely due to resource issues and lack of viable alternative treatments.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> the ways in which psychiatrists prescribe for BPSD varies amongst clinicians. Guidelines do exist, but are difficult to implement in practice. Alternative non-pharmacological strategies are required, but as yet they are difficult to access and have a questionable evidence base.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wood-Mitchell, A., James, I. A., Waterworth, A., Swann, A., Ballard, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the prescribing of medications by old age psychiatrists for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>552</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The BRIGHT tool]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective:</b> the size of the burden of unmet needs of older people living in the community is unknown. We aim to validate a brief postal questionnaire, the Brief Risk Identification of Geriatric Health Tool (BRIGHT) questionnaire, to find cases of older people with disabilities (case-finding) living in the community.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> community-dwelling patients over the age of 75 years were invited from two general practitioners in Auckland, New Zealand. Participants completed the 11-item BRIGHT questionnaire twice and were assessed at home using the Minimum Dataset for Home Care (MDS-HC) comprehensive geriatric assessment tool by a trained gerontology nurse. Retest reliability of the BRIGHT was assessed with a correlation coefficient, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the utility of the tool against standard outputs from the MDS-HC reflecting level of disability; the instrumental activities of daily living clinical assessment protocol (IADL CAP), and the MAPle score for dependency.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> 101 participants completed both the BRIGHT questionnaires and the comprehensive MDS-HC assessment. Test-retest reliability was modest with a correlation of 0.77. A sensitivity of 0.86 and specificity of 0.86 were observed for a score of 3 or more on the questionnaire in relationship to the IADL CAP. A sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.84 were observed when BRIGHT questionnaire score of 3+ was related to the MAPLe score from the MDS-HC assessment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> the BRIGHT questionnaire has acceptable utility in identifying community-dwelling older people with disability, and excellent utility in ruling them out of needing further assessment. This tool may be useful as part of an intervention process to detect unmet needs and to improve systematic surveillance of primary care populations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerse, N., Boyd, M., Mclean, C., Koziol-Mclain, J., Robb, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn145</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The BRIGHT tool]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vascular biomarkers of cognitive performance in a community-based elderly population: the Dublin Healthy Ageing study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> population studies suggest that cardiovascular risk factors may be associated with cognitive impairment. Epidemiological studies evaluating individual markers of vascular disease as risk factors for cognitive dysfunction have yielded inconsistent results. Homocysteine has emerged as a marker consistently associated with poorer outcomes. Existing studies have largely examined individual vascular risks in isolation and have tended to ignore patient psychological status.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> to investigate the association between markers of vascular disease and cognition in a community-dwelling non-demented elderly population while adjusting for vascular and non-vascular confounds.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> cross-sectional community based assessment.</p>
<p><b>Participants:</b> 466 subjects with mean age 75.45 (s.d., 6.06) years. 208 (44.6%) were male.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> higher levels of homocysteine were consistently associated with poorer performance in tests assessing visual memory and verbal recall. No other vascular biomarker was found to be associated with cognitive performance. Factors such as alcohol use, tea intake, life satisfaction, hypertension and smoking were positively correlated with global cognitive performance. Negative correlations existed between cognitive performance and depression, past history of stroke, intake of fruit and use of psychotropic medication.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> homocysteine was the only vascular biomarker associated with poorer function in a number of domains on neuropsychological testing, independent of vascular and non-vascular confounds. Other psychosocial factors may need to be taken into account as potential confounds in future studies investigating cognition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chin, A.-V., Robinson, D. J., O'Connell, H., Hamilton, F., Bruce, I., Coen, R., Walsh, B., Coakley, D., Molloy, A., Scott, J., Lawlor, B. A., Cunningham, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vascular biomarkers of cognitive performance in a community-based elderly population: the Dublin Healthy Ageing study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>564</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Promotion of health in older people: a randomised controlled trial of health risk appraisal in British general practice]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> there is inadequate evidence to support currently formulated NHS strategies to achieve health promotion and preventative care in older people through broad-based screening and assessment in primary care. The most extensively evaluated delivery instrument for this purpose is Health Risk Appraisal (HRA). This article describes a trial using HRA to evaluate the effect on health behaviour and preventative-care uptake in older people in NHS primary care.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> a randomised controlled trial was undertaken in three London primary care group practices.</p>
<p>Functionally independent community-dwelling patients older than 65 years (<I>n</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;2,503) received a self-administered Health Risk Appraisal for Older Persons (HRA-O) questionnaire leading to computer-generated individualised written feedback to participants and general practitioners (GPs), integrated into practice information-technology (IT) systems. All primary care staff received training in preventative health in older people. The main outcome measures were self-reported health behaviour and preventative care uptake at 1-year follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> of 2,503 individuals randomised, 2,006 respondents (80.1%) (intervention, <I>n</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;940, control <I>n</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;1,066) were available for analysis. Intervention group respondents reported slightly higher pneumococcal vaccination uptake and equivocal improvement in physical activity levels compared with controls. No significant differences were observed for any other categories of health behaviour or preventative care measures at 1-year follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> HRA-O implemented in this way resulted in minimal improvement of health behaviour or uptake of preventative care measures in older people. Supplementary reinforcement involving contact by health professionals with patients over and above routine clinical encounters may be a prerequisite to the effectiveness of IT-based delivery systems for health promotion in older people.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harari, D., Iliffe, S., Kharicha, K., Egger, M., Gillmann, G., Von Renteln-Kruse, W., Beck, J., Swift, C., Stuck, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn150</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Promotion of health in older people: a randomised controlled trial of health risk appraisal in British general practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>571</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent changes in general practice morbidity in older people]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hughes, H., Jordan, K. P., Rajaratnam, G., Fawcett, S., Croft, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent changes in general practice morbidity in older people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>575</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of 16-week Tai Chi intervention on postural stability and proprioception of knee and ankle in older people]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, J. X., Xu, D. Q., Hong, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of 16-week Tai Chi intervention on postural stability and proprioception of knee and ankle in older people]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>578</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/578?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Central and peripheral autonomic integrity in Parkinson's disease]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/578?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adhiyaman, V., Hobson, P., Meara, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Central and peripheral autonomic integrity in Parkinson's disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>578</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The influence of positioning upon cerebral oxygenation after acute stroke: a pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hargroves, D., Tallis, R., Pomeroy, V., Bhalla, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The influence of positioning upon cerebral oxygenation after acute stroke: a pilot study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>585</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/585?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Positional vertigo in a falls service]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/585?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawson, J., Bamiou, D.-E., Cohen, H. S., Newton, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn151</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Positional vertigo in a falls service]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>585</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationship between customary physical activity, muscle strength and physical performance in older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, H. J., Syddall, H. E., Dennison, E. M., Cooper, C., Sayer, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationship between customary physical activity, muscle strength and physical performance in older men and women: findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>593</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Mini-Mental Status Examination for the hearing impaired]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Silva, M. L., Mclaughlin, M. T., Rodrigues, E. J., Broadbent, J. C., Gray, A. R., Hammond-Tooke, G. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Mini-Mental Status Examination for the hearing impaired]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/595?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ERCP in octogenerians: a safe and efficient investigation]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/595?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riphaus, A., Stergiou, N., Wehrmann, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ERCP in octogenerians: a safe and efficient investigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>595</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/600?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A case of corticobasal degeneration presenting with alien limb syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/600?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Alien limb syndrome (ALS) is a very rare condition where the affected persons are not able to recognise the affected limb as their own, and regard it as being foreign or alien to them. We present a patient with ALS secondary to corticobasal degeneration, which is a rare neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorder. We discuss the clinical features, neuropathology and management of corticobasal degeneration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiwari, D., Amar, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A case of corticobasal degeneration presenting with alien limb syndrome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/602?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Vagolysis]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/602?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We describe the case of a 75-year-old man presenting with labile hypertension and symptomatic postural hypotension 13 months following radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of his external auditory canal. Magnetic resonance image (MRI) scan demonstrated scarring and a probable recurrence of his tumour. He underwent autonomic testing, including muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) responses to a variety of stimuli. Results were consistent with baroreflex failure. Urinary catecholamine levels were within the high normal range. We postulate that baroreflex failure was caused by vagal and glossopharyngeal nerve damage secondary to radiotherapy and tumour recurrence. This diagnosis is rare, but should be considered with pure autonomic failure and phaeochromocytoma in the presence of labile hypertension, especially in patients with a history of radiotherapy to the neck and high-normal catecholamine levels.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hutchinson, C. D., Jardine, D. L., Hurrell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Vagolysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>604</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>602</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenspan, P., Heinz, G., Hargrove, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>606</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>605</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lives of the artists]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/605-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abastado, P., Chemla, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lives of the artists]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>605</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>605</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/606?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ageism in stroke management]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/606?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luker, J., Grimmer-Somers, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ageism in stroke management]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>607</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>606</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Palnum, K. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>607</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Challenges of an Aging Society. Ethical Dilemmas, Political Issues]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Ball, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Challenges of an Aging Society. Ethical Dilemmas, Political Issues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>608</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parkinson's Disease in the Older Adult]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharma, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn136</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parkinson's Disease in the Older Adult]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>609</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Love Stories of Later Life: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Romance]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/608-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marson, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Love Stories of Later Life: A Narrative Approach to Understanding Romance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>608</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/609?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working with Adult Abuse: A Training Manual for People Working with Vulnerable Adults]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/609?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[shukla, R. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working with Adult Abuse: A Training Manual for People Working with Vulnerable Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>609</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>609</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/610?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Corrigendum]]></title>
<link>http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/37/5/610?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afn131</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Corrigendum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Geriatrics Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>37</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>610</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>610</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>